HomepageISTEEdSurge
Skip to content
ascd logo

Log in to Witsby: ASCD’s Next-Generation Professional Learning and Credentialing Platform
Join ASCD
February 1, 2016
Vol. 73
No. 5

The Write Stuff

+2
Three essential practices bolster English language learners' writing skills.

premium resources logo

Premium Resource

Instructional StrategiesEquity
The statistic is alarming. A mere one percent of 12th grade English language learners (ELLs) scored proficient or above in writing on the most recent administration of the National Assessment of Educational Progress in 2011 (National Center for Education Statistics, 2012).
It’s no wonder. The language demands associated with writing and the many constraints adolescent ELLs must juggle are formidable. These students face not only cognitive, communicative, and contextual challenges common to all writers, but also linguistic, cultural, and affective constraints unique to language learners.
In the current era of the Common Core State Standards for English Language Arts (CCSS-ELA), students are expected to master high-level literacy skills, including reading closely to make logical inferences and writing to support claims using valid reasoning and appropriate evidence (National Governors Association Center for Best Practices & Council of Chief State School Officers, 2010). Placing such a premium on the ability to interpret texts and to write extensively about those texts using academic discourse sets a high bar for all students, and especially for ELLs.
What does it take to help ELLs undertake such challenging writing tasks? To answer this question, we offer three research-based instructional practices that promote ELLs’ development of academic literacy, as well as two activities to support each practice. First, and most important, we consider culturally responsive curriculum and the significance of motivation. Second, we look at teaching students strategies, one of the most effective practices for literacy development for all students, including ELLs. And finally, because researchers generally reject the notion that academic language spontaneously develops, we explore explicit instruction that models appropriate language use.

1. Create a culturally relevant writing community.

The National Council of Teachers of English (2007) notes that “motivation can determine whether adolescents engage or disengage from literacy learning” and that the number of students who are not engaged grows at every level, “reaching epidemic proportions in high school” (p. 4). ELLs, in particular, may feel like outsiders in mainstream classrooms because of their diverse cultural backgrounds and limited English proficiency.
Meltzer and Hamann (2005) propose three fundamental ways to support ELLs emotionally and to increase motivation: (1) Develop strong ties to students—their histories and cultures—consequently linking what they are learning to their background knowledge; (2) Create classrooms that welcome students’ voices, giving them an element of choice in learning tasks; and (3) Engage students in meaningful and collaborative reading and writing activities.
In classrooms that follow these guidelines, teachers create a community of writers and actively promote collaboration to develop students’ ownership of their learning. Student work hangs on the classroom walls, showing that student voices are valued. The following two activities can help to develop such a writing community.

My Name

Sandra Cisneros’s vignette “My Name” from the 1984 novel The House on Mango Street is an especially rich mentor text. The speaker, Esperanza, struggles with how her name is pronounced in English “as if the syllables were made out of tin and hurt the roof of your mouth” rather than the softer sounds “like silver” of her name in Spanish.
Have students read the text and analyze the way Esperanza explores the meaning of her name (which translates to hope), comparing it to an emotion, an object, a color, and so forth. To follow up, invite writers to fill in sentence frames like the models below, first using Esperanza’s name and then their own name.
If Esperanza’s name were a plant, it would be a cactus because with a little watering, she hopes to be capable of producing a beautiful bloom.
If my name were a plant, it would be a dandelion because I’m strong and persistent.
If Esperanza’s name were an animal, it would be a blue bird because she could soar high into the sky and reach all of her goals.
If my name were an animal, it would be a cat because I’m curious and affectionate but also ­independent.
On the basis of their sentence frames, students can create a coat of arms (see fig. 1) and then write a paragraph about their names. These pieces of writing provide the class with an opportunity to learn about one another and to value other cultural backgrounds.

Biopoem

The biopoem is another getting-to-know-you activity that builds community. Book­ended by students’ first and last names, the poem enables students to share personal information about their likes and dislikes, hopes, and dreams (see fig. 2). Students simply complete the template. Afterward, they can share their poems with the class, or you may choose to display the finished products with students’ photographs.
After students are familiar with the format, they might write biopoems in the voice of a character from a work of literature. This activity helps ELLs to establish agency as writers; it also develops their academic writing by teaching them how to use parallel structures and relative clauses.

2. Provide solid strategy instruction.

Strategy instruction has been identified as one of the most effective approaches to improving the academic reading and writing skills of students and in advancing English language development for ELLs (Conley, 2008; Graham & Perin, 2007; Short & Fitzsimmons, 2007). Teaching strategies to students helps to make texts comprehensible and provides them with a clear focus on language. It affords students opportunities to affirm or correct their understanding and use of language, helps them retrieve new language features and use these features for academic purposes, and provides them with the means of learning language on their own, outside of class.
Although the Common Core standards acknowledge the importance of strategy instruction, the standards do not define the full range of meta­cognitive strategies that might be useful to students nor do they delineate the support ELLs might need to master such strategies. It’s up to teachers to decide which pedagogical approaches will help their ELLs become strategic readers and writers. Let’s look at two specific ideas.

Cognitive Strategies Bookmarks

Cognitive strategies are the acts of mind or “thinking tools” that readers and writers use to make sense of what we read and write. Explain to students that just as a craftsman reaches into a tool kit to build something like a skateboard ramp, we reach into our mental tool kits to construct meaning with words.
Pass out bookmarks like those in Figure 3 for students to use when they’re tasked with writing about their reading.
Demonstrate how to use the sentence starters. For the prompt “If this were a movie,” students would describe what they visualize as they read. If a student were reading Edgar Allan Poe’s “A Tell-Tale Heart,” for example, he or she might say, “If this were a movie, the camera would focus on the horrified look on the man’s face. We would hear the pounding of a heart in the background.”
The cognitive strategies sentence starters can also help students plan essays and set writing goals. A student might say, “My purpose is to identify one key survival skill that helped the author of Into Thin Air overcome the obstacles he faced on Mount Everest.” Because these bookmarks can be used during both the reading and writing processes, students may want to store them in their ELA notebooks to refer to as needed.

Do/What Chart

Many struggling students and ELLs fall back on retelling or summarizing instead of presenting high-level interpretations called for in the CCSS-ELA. Rather than carefully examining what a writing prompt is asking them to do, students simply plunge in, writing whatever they can recall about a topic. The Do/What chart focuses students’ attention on the specific requirements of an assignment.
First, tell students to deconstruct a prompt by circling the verbs that ask them to do something. Keep in mind that some ELLs may not understand terms such as make inferences, analyze, cite, and reflect. These terms, and the acts of mind they entail, must be taught and modeled using student-friendly definitions and practical examples. After identifying the verbs, students should underline the task words that tell them what to do (for example, do: write; what: an essay).
Figure 4 includes a marked-up prompt. Underneath the prompt, students can create a T-chart (the Do words in the left column and the What words in the right) to serve as clear road map for composing.

3. Explicitly teach academic language.

Without a doubt, ELLs must gain enough command of academic language to write well and reach the Common Core’s rigorous standards. English language learners cannot acquire academic language merely through their interactions with others and their reading. Even when they interact with skillful speakers of English, these conversations are unlikely to include academic language. Moreover, many of these students do not receive much exposure to academic language in their reading, because their reading is limited by their language proficiency.
Instead, ELLs need daily, explicit instruction in academic English to develop an academic style of writing. Below, we describe two activities to enhance students’ use of academic ­language.

Comparing Informal Language with Formal Academic English

In our analyses of student writing, ELLs’ most frequent mistakes in formal essays involve using slang and colloquial vocabulary, deleting word endings, and writing incomplete sentences. To explicitly teach these skills, provide side-by-side models of paragraphs written in informal English and more formal academic English. For instance, one paragraph may begin with the following sentence: “Ms. Georgia Reid was my teacher. She motivate and change students.” The more formal sentence would read: “Ms. Georgia Reid, my 4th grade teacher, inspired her students and changed their lives.”
Students should make a two-column chart listing the language features of both samples. In the “informal” column, students may write “slang,” “incomplete sentences,” and “sentences beginning with the word and.” In the “formal academic” column, students might write “academic terms,” “complete sentences,” and “transition words like nevertheless and moreover.”
Afterward, students can revise the informal paragraph to make it more academic; although the finished product may be similar to the original formal paragraph you provided, the deliberate repetition and practice will help students internalize these new skills. Students can then incorporate what they learned into their own formal academic essays about their favorite teacher.

Acknowledging and Refuting ­Counterarguments

Argumentative writing poses special challenges for ELLs, even those with moderate to strong levels of English proficiency. Many have not had much experience with this genre and may need explicit instruction in how to announce their topics and engage their readers, write strong thesis statements, link paragraphs with smooth transitions, and especially acknowledge and refute counter­arguments. Sentence frames, such as the ones below, may be particularly useful to ELLs for this last skill:
  • Some people might say that __________. However, __________.
  • Although it is true that __________, it does not necessarily follow that __________.
  • Some might assume that __________, but what they fail to consider is that __________.
To start, allow students to use these frames to orally debate accessible topics, such as whether McDonald’s or Burger King makes better French fries. For example, a student might say, “Some people might argue that McDonald’s makes better French fries than Burger King. However, Mc-Donald’s’ fries lose their taste when they get cold, whereas Burger King’s fries are delicious even when cold because of the secret seasoning.” Later, students can tackle more complex academic tasks with the support of these frames—for instance, analyzing a controversial position statement and then writing an argument agreeing or disagreeing with the author.

Writing: An Essential Skill for the Many

Demographers estimate that by 2020, one in four children enrolled in America’s public schools will be Latino (Maxwell, 2012). Further, ELLs in grades 7–12 are the fastest growing segment of the K–12 student population (Batalova & McHugh, 2010). Now more than ever, teachers must be well-prepared to meet the needs of ELLs and have a diverse repertoire of strategies to help these students succeed as academic writers. Because writing is a gatekeeper for college admission and a key criterion for hiring and promoting salaried workers, the ability to write well is “not a frill for the few, but an essential skill for the many” (National Commission on Writing for America’s Families, Schools, and Colleges, 2003).
References

Batalova, J., & McHugh, M. (2010). Number and growth of students in U.S. schools in need of English instruction. Washington, DC: Migration Policy Institute.

Cisneros, S. (1984). The house on Mango Street. Houston, TX: Arte Público Press.

Conley, M. W. (2008). Cognitive strategy instruction for adolescents: What we know about the promise, what we don’t know about the potential. Harvard Educational Review, 78(1), 84–106.

Graham, S., & Perin, D. (2007). A meta-analysis of writing instruction for adolescent students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99(3), 445–476.

Maxwell, L. (2012). Raising Latino achievement seen as ‘demographic imperative.’ Education Week, 31(34), 4–5.

Meltzer, J., & Hamann, E. T. (2005). Meeting the literacy development needs of adolescent English language learners through content area learning part two: Focus on classroom teaching and learning strategies. Brown University: The Education Alliance. Retrieved from www.brown.edu/academics/education-alliance/sites/brown.edu.academics​.education-alliance/files/publications/adell_litdv2.pdf

National Center for Education Statistics. (2012). The nation’s report card: Writing 2011, grade 12 national results, English language learners (Online report). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved from www​.nationsreportcard.gov/writing_2011/g12_national.aspx

National Commission on Writing for America’s Families, Schools, and Colleges. (2003). The neglected “R”: The need for a writing revolution. New York: College Board.

National Council of Teachers of English. (2007). Adolescent literacy: A policy research brief. Urbana, IL: Author.

National Governors Association Center for Best Practices & Council of Chief State School Officers. (2010). Common Core State Standards for English language arts and literacy in history/social studies, science, and technical subjects. Washington, DC: Authors.

Short, D. J., & Fitzsimmons, S. (2007). Double the work: Challenges and solutions to acquiring language and academic literacy for adolescent English language learners–A report to Carnegie Corporation of New York. Washington, DC: Alliance for Excellent Education.

Carol Booth Olson is an associate professor in the School of Education at UC Irvine and director of the UCI Site of the National Writing Project.

Learn More


ASCD is a community dedicated to educators' professional growth and well-being.

Let us help you put your vision into action.
Related Articles
View all
undefined
Instructional Strategies
Designing Joyful Learning
Richard Culatta
3 weeks ago

undefined
Busting the Myth of Equitable Class Discussions
Matthew R. Kay
3 weeks ago

undefined
Joyful, Better Project-Based Learning
Bryan Goodwin & Jess Nastasi
3 weeks ago

undefined
Student-Led Feedback for Critical Thinking
Douglas Fisher & Nancy Frey
3 weeks ago

undefined
Digital Foundations: It’s Elementary!
Debbie Tannenbaum
2 months ago
Related Articles
Designing Joyful Learning
Richard Culatta
3 weeks ago

Busting the Myth of Equitable Class Discussions
Matthew R. Kay
3 weeks ago

Joyful, Better Project-Based Learning
Bryan Goodwin & Jess Nastasi
3 weeks ago

Student-Led Feedback for Critical Thinking
Douglas Fisher & Nancy Frey
3 weeks ago

Digital Foundations: It’s Elementary!
Debbie Tannenbaum
2 months ago
From our issue
Product cover image 116032.jpg
Helping ELLs Excel
Go To Publication